Saturday, December 4, 2010

mamby pambys need not watch hockey

those who call for the elimination of fighting from the game of hockey do not understand the sport, they don't understand the passion involved in defending their turf and/or their teammates...in fact, they probably don't understand the passion to compete in any sport at any level, from sandlot to the pros...

take the juxtaposition of two teams in different sports in two different cities on back-to-back nights...

cleveland and buffalo are the red-headed stepchildren of professional sports cities...they're mocked and ridiculed by pundits and "experts" throughout the sports world...they have a very similar demographic make-up within declining cities and both have a rabid, loyal fan-base who's sports teams have not won a championship in decades...yes, they both yearn for a triumphant parade in their hometown, but, in lieu of that, what they ask for, at the very least, is an honest effort game-in, game-out...they want the players to match their passion...

in cleveland thursday night, it was the return of lebron james to the city he jilted for the greener pastures of miami...expectations were high, fans were indignant and the cavaliers were expected to match the intensity of their scorned fan-base...after all, the team and players were dissed just like the city was...

james was introduced to a full chorus of boos during his introduction, and he was booed resoundingly throughout the game...one of the questions; will he do his narcissistic "talcum-toss?"...would he have the audacity to slap his former teammates, team and city on national tv again with this pre-game ritual of self-indulgence?...yes, he did it, amidst the jeers of those court-side as his former teammates looked on...

it's not that i expected any cavalier player to do anything, especially after all of the "hey-buddy" warmth they displayed for him pre-game...ok, fine...i guess they'd show it during the game, play hard, play intense, play like james and the heat were there to impose their will on the team and that they'd have no part of that...play like they had a passion for the team and it's fan-base and would not be an embarrassment to themselves on their home court... 

after a rather robust start, the cavaliers caved...they laid down like the wimpy little rich-kids that they really are, more interested in coddling their former teammate than defending their turf...james walked all over them and no one even tried to stop him...no harassment, no hard fouls, no disguised cheap-shots...nothing...he torched them so thoroughly that colin cowherd called it "the validation" of james' decision to leave because this cavaliers team was empty and useless, devoid of skill and, most importantly, they lacked an inner passion to compete...the cavs completely embarrassed themselves, cowering on their knees like a jilted lover waiting for an apology which will never come...

the following night, the buffalo sabres were home for their first game in six days, vs. the columbus blue jackets...the sabres were still reeling from a very poor start to their season, especially at home...the sabres are also a team that can be intimidated into folding, as has been seen for the better part of a decade, and if you play tough, and impose your will upon them, they'll wilt and fall into submission...

unfortunately for the jackets last night, the sabres fought back, and fought back with a vengeance in an atypical display of grit an toughness...mike commodore of the jackets got decked by cody mccormick after a commodore just finished serving a 5-minute major for boarding...the sabres' steve montador dropped 'em with jacket tough-guy jared boll to take one on the chin (and in the face as well) for the team..and patrick kaleta...wow!!!!...patrick kaleta pummeled  derek dorsett after dorsett tried to mess with sabres leading goal-scorer thomas vanek:




and that's why fighting in hockey is good...

you don't see the pre-game narcissistic antics of lebron james in hockey...would he have tried anything like that in warm-ups, he woulda been jumped, and a fight would have broken out as the opposing players would have taken it for what it was--showboating...and, if you're gonna showboat, you better be able to back it up...

that's hockey...

dany heatley didn't showboat in his return to ottawa, but the sens laid down just like the cavs on the very same night, no less, having been shut out in an embarrassing 4-0 loss on their home ice...the disdain for heatley by the fans did not spill over onto the ice as the passionless sens embarrassed themselves, their team, their owner and their city...just like the cavaliers did...

oh...and...not one single fight in the game, only a token roughing penalty by sens-pest chris neil in the third when the game was pretty much decided...

there's your reason for fighting in hockey, and not those crappy staged fights between resident heavyweights in a programmed side-show...i'm talking about fights while in defense of your turf, your teammates, your team, your city and/or your dignity...fights that say, "i give a sh!t"...

those who argue that fighting should be banned are of the colin cowherd pencil-necked geek variety who were no closer to organized sports than intramural play...they never played at home with friends like every game was for the championship of the world, and that even your blood-brother was your enemy, if he was on the other side,for however long the event lasted...they'll never know the that inner-passion to compete is a victory, even if the game ends in defeat...never know that defending your turf is never embarrassing, even if you get blown out...they'll never know that a black-eye for the team means more to the fans than a pretty smile for the camera...

for those who want fighting banned, i offer a simple solution...shut your traps...or go follow basketball...




Friday, December 3, 2010

best gm's for the buck, #4, darcy regier

forbes magazine released it's "best gm's for the buck" in the post-lockout nhl and darcy regier came in at #4 behind (in order) david poile (nsh,) doug wilson (sjs,) and ken holland (det)... former atlanta thrashers gm, don waddell rounded out the top-five...#6 thru #10 were (in order,) ray shero (pit,) george mcphee (wash,) jim rutheford (car,) garth snow (nyi,) and brian burke (tor)...

how did regier, and especially waddel and snow, make it into the top-ten gm's besides holland, shero and mcphee?...the magazine used a points system based upon points during the regular season and points for post-season appearances as measured against payroll to define payroll dollars per point...that's how...

to sabres fans, we've watched regier's teams over the past 5 seasons and we know just how much this team rode the wave of success that came pre-july 1, 2007...after that mark, we've seen mediocre seasons with one post-season appearance in the past three years--a first-round exit, btw...take out those first two seasons, though, and he'd probably end up in the middle of the pack, just like his teams...

#4 on a forbes list is quite the honor to put on a resume', just in time, too, as the sabres seem to be on the verge of being sold to billionaire terry pegula...

it's all well and good, and regier seems to have done the job that his bosses wanted him to do...should pegula end up with the team, and should his demand to produce a stanley cup (or cups, plural) go from talk to action, would regier be able to use this ranking as the hallmark for the interview process?...if there is one?

some background on terry pegula from bucky gleason

terry pegula
buffalo news columnist bucky gleason worked the phones for some background info on potential sabres buyer terry pegula...overall a very good piece with pegula coming off as a "buffalo kind of guy"...

sure looks that way as gleason has his sources use words like, "honest," "blue-collar," "down-to-earth," and "loyal"...one source says that "people will identify with him up [in buffalo]"...nice...

it's a long piece, that is hopeful, exuberant, and very optimistic...but, as with bucky, there always seems to be an opinionated poke at management, and here's how he slides it in...throughout the piece he uses quotes from his sources, yet in this paragraph, there's nothing that denotes a quote from either his sources or from pegula himself:

"He was upset when Chris Drury and Daniel Briere left the organization. He couldn't comprehend how the team let Henrik Tallinder get away because he wanted a four-year contract rather than the three-year deal it offered."

the drury/briere thing has been a constant for gleason as he berates management for its utter failure in this matter...and that's fine...but to say that the potential new owner was "upset" with the way it was handled and then to follow up with how "he couldn't comprehend" the hank tallinder situation without attributing it to a source is somewhat underhanded...it's a slick way to interject his opinion and have it become part of the background of the subject...

i brought this up during his chat yesterday and asked him to clarify and his rebuttal was, "No, I don't care to clarify. What I wrote was accurate."

what he wrote (and writes) has an influence upon his immediate audience in the buffalo area as well as a national audience as the sale of a professional franchise is national sports/business news...jerry sullivan on the howard simon show this morning said, concerning pegula, "just to have a guy like that who would be a fan...and is, like concerned that they, he agrees with me that they [inaudible] signed tallinder was a bad idea."

so pegula agrees with sullivan and gleason and we're to believe this because what gleason wrote was "accurate" even though no source was named?...

i've seen bucky do this before and i don't buy what he's selling...stick to the facts, bucky, and don't put words in other peoples mouths, no matter how disdainful you are of management or how much your ego needs to be fed...it ain't right

individual sats for the month of november

the 6-day layoff ends tonight and we look back at the individual stats as the team finished 6-6-1 for the month of november (previous month's leaders above):

points--derek roy, 13...jordan leopold, tim connolly, thomas vanek, drew stafford, 7
         --derek roy, thomas vanek, 11...jordan leopold, 9

goals--roy, 6....vanek, connolly, 4
        --vanek, 5...leopold, 4...tyler ennis, roy, 3
power play goals--vanek, myers, 2...roy, leopold, 1
                    (yr.)--vanek, 5...roy, tyler myers, ,leopold, 2
assists--roy, 7...tyler ennis, steve montador, 5
          --roy, 8...vanek, 6...tim connolly, leopold, 5
power play assists--roy, 4...eight with 1
                     (yr.)--roy, 6...connolly, 5...vanek, 3
primary assists--ennis, roy, montador, 4
                      --roy, 6...rob niedermayer, 3...five with 2
plus/minus--montador, +9...ennis, +4...stafford, goose, +3
                --montador +16, leopold, +5...ennis, roy, +2
plus/minus (bottom)--myers, -10...vanek, -5...morrisonn, -4
                             --morrison, -12...myers, -10, connolly, -9

forwards avg. toi:
total--roy, 19:37...stafford, 16:48...vanek, 16:38
      --roy, 19:50...pomminville, 17:23...vanek, 17:11
even strength--roy, 15:04...stafford, 13:18...vanek, 13:06
                   --roy, 14:37, vanek, 13:18...hecht, 13:00
power play--roy, 3:32...vanek, 3:25...stafford, 3:14
                --vanek, 3:59...roy, pomminville, 3:48
penalty kill--mike grier, 3:17...jochen hecht, 2:17...connolly, 2:05
                --grier, 2:57...hecht, 2:08...pomminville, 1:50

defensemen avg. toi:
total--jordan leopold, 23:56...tyler myers, 23:26...montador, andrej sekera, 19:08
      --leopold, 23:51...myers, 23:41...montador, 20:24
even strength--leopold, 17:36...myers, 16:44...montador, 16:39
                   --leopold, 18:11...montador, 17:47...myers, 16:48
power play--myers, 3:15...leopold, 3:11...sekera, 2:48
                --myers, 3:27...leopold, 2:54...dekera, 2:34
penalty kill--myers, 3:26...morrisonn, 3:23...leopold, 3:09
                --myers, 3:27...leopold, 2:45...morrison, 2:27

goaltending (yr. to date below):
ryan miller--3-5-2...277 sa...27 ga.......gaa, 2.71...sv. percentage, .903...shutouts, 0
               --7-7-2...474.......44...................2.55........................., .914.................0
patrick lalime--0-2...62 sa...06ga......gaa, 4.03...
                    --0-4...129.....14.................3.03............................., .897.................0
jhonas enroth--2-2...126.....13.................2.90............................., .891.................0

Thursday, December 2, 2010

what will terry pegula do as owner of the buffalo sabres?

(shrugs)...but as someone who recently gone through ownership changes in my business, it's safe to assume that terry pegula has an inner circle of people in whom he trusts and pretty sure that larry quinn and dan dipofi are not a part of that inner circle as of right now...could they be?...possibly...but those are tom golisano's men, not pegula's, and no matter what's been mentioned about golisano "taking care" of quinn and making him a part of the deal, i can't see it happening...this is big-time, and you go with whom you've known and in whom you trust...right or wrong...

at $175m (if this pricetag is true,) we're talking about a major acquisition at a price that's either at market value or slightly above...golisano pulled a classic "buy low, sell high" business maneuver and will reap the financial benefits from having the money to seize upon the opportunity that was afforded him...for his part, pegula would own a sabres franchise that, because of the (possible) $175m price, is really at its peak...right now...the only way to really increase the value of the franchise is to....win the cup...or better yet cups, plural...

if everythings that's been said about pegula is to be believed, then buffalo fans should take to heart that this self-described "rink-rat" with a passion for hockey and a genuine attachment to the buffalo area is more interested in winning the cup, than making a huge profit...

that being said, if winning a stanley cup (or cups) is the driving force behind the purchase of the sabres, i'm not sure larry quinn's the man to take helm as a sr. vp of hockey operations...after all, quinn is ultimately responsible for the lack of a championship over the past seven seasons--and especially the last four, where he oversaw the debacle that was july 1, 2007 and the ensuing status-quo approach since...it was quinn who promised a "thorough review of the organization from top to bottom" in 2009 after a second-straight non-playoff season and nothing of significance happened...he also mentioned that changes were coming after last season's first round exit...yet nothing of real significance happened...

he got tom golisano to open his wallet and stabilize the franchise...yet his legacy will be more about a mediocre team with some innovative marketing which kept the sabres in the black...not the type of guy i'd want to help bring a cup or cups to buffalo

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

a post from a hockey rumors site:

"All of this talk about thanking Golisano...Great...If you must thank him go ahead...As I recall there were 2 other potential buyers at the time and Golisano happened to be Bettmans favorite....Me...I just say good riddance TG....You had the ability to provide us with a competitive team but instead you chose to use the team to make money for yourself forsaking the good fans of Buffalo by providing an underachieving, less than mediocre team that portrayed your own lack of enthusiasm for the game and winning. Goodbye TG and take that piece of trash Larry with you. I hope you enjoy all of the money you made off the good people of Buffalo."--a post from a hockey rumors website

dude, really?




"meh" month of november for the sabres

the buffalo sabres really needed to get a couple more wins in november to off-set the nightmare that was october where they went 3-7-2...they ended up going 6-6-1 for the month...better, but still not good enough

when gm darcy regier was asked a week and a half ago if he thought that this team was a playoff team he said, "yes, i do"...well, the team is on a pace for less than 90 points which is probably the low-end of the projected cut-off point...but, as long as the gm thinks that, then...(aye, yaye yaye)

anyhow, this group heads into december playing better overall hockey with three more wins than the previous month...not to mention that there could be a new owner by the end of the month/year in terry pegula...

regardless, this is where the team stands as of today, with the previous months standings preceding:

wins: 3, tied for last (njd, phx, edm)------9 (26th)

points: 8, tied for second last (edm, fla)-------21 (25th)
eastern conference: 14th-------11th
n.e. div: 5th------4th

goals/game: 2.50 (22nd)...(#1, tampa, 3.50)-------2.40 (25th)...(#1, col, 3.52)
goals against/game: 3.17 (23rd)...(bos, 1.38)-------2.92 (23rd, tied, anaheim)...(mtl, 1.96)
shots/game: 33.2 (5th)...(sjs, 35.6)-------32.7 (4th, tied, chicago)...(sjs, 35.6)
shots against/game: 28.5 (10th)...(stl, 25.8)-------29.4 (11th)...(stl, 26.8)

powerplay: 13.0% (20th)...(sjs, 31.8)-------13.4% (26th)...(van, 29.3)
penalty kill: 74.5% (27th)...(bos, 93.1)-------81.6% (20th)...(pit, 90.5)
faceoffs: 47.5% (27th)...(sjs, 56.4)-------47.9% (27th)...(van, 56.9)